How to rationalize the debate about 'EU Energy Third Package'?  Revisiting criteria to compare electricity transmission organizations

dc.contributor.author	LÉVÊQUE, François
dc.contributor.author	GLACHANT, Jean-Michel
dc.contributor.author	SAGUAN, Marcelo
dc.contributor.author	DE MUIZON, Gildas
dc.date.accessioned	2009-03-30T14:38:44Z
dc.date.available	2009-03-30T14:38:44Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.issn	1028-3625
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1814/11028
dc.description.abstract	This article develops a theoretical framework to rank different electricity transmission organizations according five criteria (transaction cost saving, performance based regulation implementation, conflicts of interest, non-discriminatory access and benefits from regional integration). We demonstrate that ITSO is not always the first-best arrangement when taking into account the benefits from regional integration.	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	EUI RSCAS	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	2009/15	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Loyola de Palacio Programme on Energy Policy	en
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	ownership unbundling	en
dc.subject	EU Energy Internal Market	en
dc.subject	Energy Third Package	en
dc.subject	Transmission system operators	en
dc.title	How to rationalize the debate about 'EU Energy Third Package'? Revisiting criteria to compare electricity transmission organizations	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en
eui.subscribe.skip	true