Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKRATOCHWIL, Friedrich
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-05T14:03:27Z
dc.date.available2009-11-05T14:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationInternational Organization, 2009, 63, 701-731en
dc.identifier.issn0020-8183
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/12774
dc.description.abstractThis article moves from deconstruction to reconstruction in research methodology. It proposes pragmatism as a way to escape from epistemological deadlock. We first show that social scientists are mistaken in their hope to obtain warranted knowledge through traditional scientific methods. We then show that pragmatism has grown from tacit commonsense to an explicit item on the agenda of the international relations discipline. We suggest that a coherent pragmatic approach consists of two elements: the recognition of knowledge generation as a social and discursive activity, and the orientation of research toward the generation of useful knowledge. To offer a concrete example of what pragmatic methodology can look like, we propose the research strategy of abduction. We assess various forms of research design to further elucidate how pragmatic research works in practice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleOn Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodologyen
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record