Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFRANCIONI, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-29T11:34:37Z
dc.date.available2010-01-29T11:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1831-4066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/13137
dc.description.abstractDeparting from the contemporary trend favourable to the re-conceptualisation of human rights in terms of obligations of non state actors, this paper argues that and effective compliance with international human right standards by private military and security companies can be achieved by a complementary use of principles of state responsibility, in particular of responsibility of the home state of the company, and of the criteria (territory-jurisdiction) that determine the substantive scope of application of the human rights obligations with respect to the prevention and remediation of possible abuses by private contractors. On the basis of an analysis of the relevant international law and practice, this paper attempts to offer a preliminary identification of the regulatory standards required to promote compliance with human rights by the emerging transnational military-security industry.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI AELen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2009/18en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPRIV-WAR Projecten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleThe responsibility of the PMSC’s home state for human rights violations arising from the export of private military and security servicesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record