“Often we are deceived, and we suffer glaucoma”. Rethinking Legal Humanism in the History of the Western Rights Tradition

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author LONGFIELD KARR, Susan
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-01T08:11:25Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-01T08:11:25Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.issn 1830-7728
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/13394
dc.description.abstract This working paper argues for renewed attention by scholars of early modern political and legal thought as to how and why humanist jurists invoked the authority of rights—natural and customary—to legitimize or to critique the expansion of authority underway within Europe in the early sixteenth century. It suggests that attention to legal humanists’ discussions of natural law, ius, and ius gentium can offer new insights into one of the most complex problems addressed within the literature: the transformation of natural rights into human rights within the history of early modern political and legal thought. As such this working paper consists primarily of a review of the historiography, wherein legal humanism is either characterized as an incongruity, is dismissed, or is omitted altogether from the history of modern rights theories. After exploring the dominant literature, this essay then provides a broad comparative overview of why it is worth revisiting legal humanism for historians and human rights scholars alike. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartofseries EUI MWP en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2010/05 en
dc.subject Natural law en
dc.subject natural rights en
dc.subject ius gentium en
dc.subject legal humanism en
dc.subject Renaissance humanism en
dc.subject early modern political and legal thought en
dc.title “Often we are deceived, and we suffer glaucoma”. Rethinking Legal Humanism in the History of the Western Rights Tradition en
dc.type Working Paper en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record