Judicial Epistemology of Free Speech Through Ancient Lenses

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author BELAVUSAU, Uladzislau
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-10T08:18:35Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-10T08:18:35Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2010, 23, 2, 165-183 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/13512
dc.description.abstract The article is the author’s endeavor to reconstruct the semiotic conflict in the transatlantic legal appraisal of hate speech (between the USA and Europe) through Ancient Greek concepts of παρρησία (parrhēsia) and ισηγορία (isēgoria). The US Supreme Court case law on the First Amendment to American Constitution is, therefore, counter-balanced vis-à-vis la jurisprudence de Strasbourg on Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The author suggests that an adequate comprehension of the contemporary constitutional concepts of the right to free speech in Western democracies is deceptive without a thorough analysis of its genealogy in the Ancient rhetorical cradle en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.uri http://www.springerlink.com/content/a650802lg563321k/?p=837b3efb46dd44a5ada499b8452bcd2d&pi=2
dc.subject Freedom of expression en
dc.subject Hate speech en
dc.subject U.S. Supreme Court en
dc.subject European Court of Human Rights en
dc.subject Parrhesia en
dc.subject Isegoria en
dc.title Judicial Epistemology of Free Speech Through Ancient Lenses en
dc.type Article en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record