Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBELAVUSAU, Uladzislau
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-10T08:18:35Z
dc.date.available2010-03-10T08:18:35Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2010, 23, 2, 165-183en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/13512
dc.description.abstractThe article is the author’s endeavor to reconstruct the semiotic conflict in the transatlantic legal appraisal of hate speech (between the USA and Europe) through Ancient Greek concepts of παρρησία (parrhēsia) and ισηγορία (isēgoria). The US Supreme Court case law on the First Amendment to American Constitution is, therefore, counter-balanced vis-à-vis la jurisprudence de Strasbourg on Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The author suggests that an adequate comprehension of the contemporary constitutional concepts of the right to free speech in Western democracies is deceptive without a thorough analysis of its genealogy in the Ancient rhetorical cradleen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.springerlink.com/content/a650802lg563321k/?p=837b3efb46dd44a5ada499b8452bcd2d&pi=2
dc.subjectFreedom of expressionen
dc.subjectHate speechen
dc.subjectU.S. Supreme Courten
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rightsen
dc.subjectParrhesiaen
dc.subjectIsegoriaen
dc.titleJudicial Epistemology of Free Speech Through Ancient Lensesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record