Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHORNER, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorMORELLI, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorSQUINTANI, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-27T10:33:00Z
dc.date.available2010-08-27T10:33:00Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1725-6704
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/14438
dc.description.abstractThis paper brings mechanism design to the study of conflict resolution in international relations. We determine when and how unmediated communication and mediation reduce the ex ante probability of conflict, in a simple game where conflict is due to asymmetric information. Unmediated communication helps reducing the chance of conflict as it allows conflicting parties to reveal their types and establish type-dependent transfers to avoid conflict. Mediation improves upon unmediated communication when the intensity of conflict is high, or when asymmetric information is large. The mediator improves upon unmediated communication by not precisely reporting information to conflicting parties, and precisely, by not revealing to a player with probability one that the opponent is weak. Surprisingly, in our set up, arbitrators who can enforce settlements are no more effective in reducing the probability of conflict than mediators who can only make non-binding recommendations.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI ECOen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2010/32en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMediationen
dc.subjectWar and Peaceen
dc.subjectImperfect Informationen
dc.subjectCommunication Gamesen
dc.subjectOptimal Mechanismen
dc.subjectC7en
dc.titleMediation and Peaceen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.neeo.contributorHORNER|Johannes|aut|
dc.neeo.contributorMORELLI|Massimo|aut|EUI70015
dc.neeo.contributorSQUINTANI|Francesco|aut|
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record