dc.contributor.author | KAEDING, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | HARDACRE, Alan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-16T12:24:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-11-16T12:24:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1028-3625 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/14956 | |
dc.description.abstract | The history of comitology – the system of implementation committees that control the Commission in
the execution of delegated powers – has been characterised by institutional tensions. The crux of these
tensions has often been the role of the European Parliament and its quest to be granted powers equal to
those of the Council. Over time this tension has been resolved through a series of inter-institutional
agreements and Comitology Decisions, essentially giving the Parliament incremental increases in
power. This process came to a head with the 2006 Comitology reform and the introduction of the
regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS). After just over three years of experience with the RPS
procedure, and having revised the entire acquis communautaire, the Treaty of Lisbon made has made
it redundant through the creation of Delegated Acts (Article 290 TFEU), which gives the Parliament
equal rights of oversight. This article aims to evaluate the practical implications that Delegated Acts
will entail for the Parliament, principally by using the four years of experience with the RPS to better
understand the challenges ahead. This analysis will be of interest to those following the study of
comitology, formal and informal interinstitutional relations, and also to practitioners who will have to
work with Delegated Acts in the future. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | EUDO - European Union Democracy Observatory | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUI RSCAS | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2010/85 | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUDO - European Union Democracy Observatory | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | European Parliament | en |
dc.subject | Comitology | en |
dc.subject | regulatory procedure with scrutiny | en |
dc.subject | de facto right of amendment | en |
dc.subject | right of veto | en |
dc.title | The Execution of Delegated Powers after Lisbon. A timely analysis of the Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny and its lessons for Delegated Acts | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |