Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author LADEUR, Karl-Heinz
dc.date.accessioned 2003-07-01T07:40:59Z
dc.date.available 2003-07-01T07:40:59Z
dc.date.created 1999
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/149
dc.description.uri http://www.iue.it/LAW/WP-Texts/law99_4.pdf
dc.format.extent 76960
dc.format.medium In stock
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher European University Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseries EUI LAW
dc.relation.ispartofseries 1999/04
dc.title Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation en
dc.type Working Paper
eui.subscribe.skip true


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record