Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation

dc.contributor.author	LADEUR, Karl-Heinz
dc.date.accessioned	2003-07-01T07:40:59Z
dc.date.available	2003-07-01T07:40:59Z
dc.date.created	1999
dc.date.issued	1999
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1814/149
dc.description.uri	http://www.iue.it/LAW/WP-Texts/law99_4.pdf
dc.format.extent	76960
dc.format.medium	In stock
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	European University Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseries	EUI LAW
dc.relation.ispartofseries	1999/04
dc.title	Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation	en
dc.type	Working Paper
eui.subscribe.skip	true