Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVASCONCELOS VILAÇA, Guilherme
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-09T14:41:47Z
dc.date.available2010-12-09T14:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2010, 3, 1, 169-180, Comparing Lawen
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/15160
dc.description.abstractThis review essay discusses in detail a recent volume of theoretically informed legal anthropological articles dealing with the intrinsic relationship between law, power and violence in the exercise of governance. The book offers a step forward in legal research by bridging the gap between legal and social theory. However, the volume is also tributary of the methodological problems that arise with this approach. I focus on several issues. First, and persistently, the lack of an analytical distinction between law/non law makes difficult to understand exactly through which medium is power exercised. Second, in most contributions the normative assumptions underpinning them are not spelled out and/or discussed. Thirdly, most case studies work with insufficiently complex conceptualizations of society. Fourthly, few essays manage to distinguish between first and second-order problems associated to law. Due to these four methodological shortcomings, the purchase of critical legal anthropology, namely to offer a better understanding of the case studies, is seriously restricted.en
dc.formatdigital
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ejls.eu/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcomparing law
dc.titleThe Ashes of Law - Book Review; Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann and Julia Eckert, Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling: On the Governance of Law, Burlington, Ashgate, 2009en
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record