Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLORENZETTI, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-22T10:11:34Z
dc.date.available2010-12-22T10:11:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1830-1541
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/15235
dc.description.abstractJudicial diplomacy can be seen as a cooperative action and interaction among domestic courts, usually highest judicial bodies, towards regional legal integration. It has manifested itself in two ways: (1) through dialogue and exchange of information among judges, lawyers, and law schools; and (2) through cooperative activities among national Supreme Courts. Dialogue among the Supreme Courts has been taking place for over a decade in the Mercosur, the Ibero-American Judicial System, the Organization of Supreme Courts of the Americas and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These organizations were created for the cooperation, agreement and exchange of experiences among the highest instances of Ibero-American judiciaries. Crimes against humanity cases shown in this paper illustrate the relationship between different Courts and the dialogue between sources of law as the real challenge of the judicial decision.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCAS PP
dc.relation.ispartofseries2010/03
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectGlobal governanceen
dc.subjectJudicial diplomacyen
dc.subjectCrimes against humanityen
dc.subjectlegal integrationconstitutionalen
dc.subjectpluralismen
dc.subjectdialogue between sources of lawen
dc.titleGlobal Governance: Dialogue Between Courtsen
dc.typeOtheren
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record