Global Governance: Dialogue Between Courts

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author LORENZETTI, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned 2010-12-22T10:11:34Z
dc.date.available 2010-12-22T10:11:34Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.issn 1830-1541
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15235
dc.description.abstract Judicial diplomacy can be seen as a cooperative action and interaction among domestic courts, usually highest judicial bodies, towards regional legal integration. It has manifested itself in two ways: (1) through dialogue and exchange of information among judges, lawyers, and law schools; and (2) through cooperative activities among national Supreme Courts. Dialogue among the Supreme Courts has been taking place for over a decade in the Mercosur, the Ibero-American Judicial System, the Organization of Supreme Courts of the Americas and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These organizations were created for the cooperation, agreement and exchange of experiences among the highest instances of Ibero-American judiciaries. Crimes against humanity cases shown in this paper illustrate the relationship between different Courts and the dialogue between sources of law as the real challenge of the judicial decision. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartofseries EUI RSCAS PP
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2010/03
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global Governance Programme
dc.subject Global governance en
dc.subject Judicial diplomacy en
dc.subject Crimes against humanity en
dc.subject legal integrationconstitutional en
dc.subject pluralism en
dc.subject dialogue between sources of law en
dc.title Global Governance: Dialogue Between Courts en
dc.type Other en
eui.subscribe.skip true


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record