Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSVETLICINII, Alexandr
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-17T14:06:17Z
dc.date.available2011-01-17T14:06:17Z
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Law Reporter, 2010, 10, 318-322en
dc.identifier.issn1028-9690
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/15363
dc.description.abstractThe ruling concerns the enforcement of the Commission’s recidivism policy, i.e. taking into account prior infringements of competition law when calculating the amount of the fine. The ECJ reaffirmed the Commission’s discretion in that area by rejecting any fixed limitation periods and dismissing the appellant’s argument that Commission’s prior infringement decisions have to become definite in order for the Commission to consider the existence of a repeated infringement.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleEpilogue of the Plasterboard Litigation: How Much Legal Certainty in the Commission's Treatment of Repeated Infringements?en
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record