Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSKOUTARIS, Nikos
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-07T13:20:12Z
dc.date.available2011-03-07T13:20:12Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Law Review, 2010, 35, 5, 720-733en
dc.identifier.issn0307-5400
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/15947
dc.description.abstractOn March 1, 2010, the Strasbourg Court delivered its decision in Demopoulos v Turkey. With this judgment, the Court allowed the building of what could be considered to be a transitional justice mechanism for the settlement of the property aspect of the Cyprus issue. Thus, it influenced the fragile balance in the current negotiations for the reunification of Cyprus. This article analyses this landmark judgment by tracing the reasoning of the Court to earlier case law on issues arising from the Cyprus dispute, discussing the discrepancies between the ECtHR judgment in Demopoulos and the ECJ decision in Apostolides v Orams, and referring to the political ramifications of the decision.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleBuilding Transitional Justice Mechanisms Without a Peace Settlement. A critical appraisal of the recent jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court on the Cyprus issueen
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record