How to Proceed After Copenhagen

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record KUNNAS, Jan 2011-03-17T09:34:33Z 2011-03-17T09:34:33Z 2011
dc.identifier.citation Electronic Green Journal, 2011, 1, 31, 1-8 (Article 3) en
dc.identifier.issn 1076-7975
dc.description.abstract In this paper, I bring forth a proposal on how to proceed with the Climate Negotiations after the meager results of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in December 2009 in Copenhagen. I argue that splitting continued negotiations into two separate blocks could both save time and make it more likely to ultimately reach a comprehensive treaty in Mexico City in December 2010. The first block would deal with historical emissions of greenhouse gases including a mutual debt cancellation: developed countries carbon debts vs. developing countries conventional monetary debts. The second block would deal with future emissions and how to finance adaption to climate change. Following the polluter pays –principle, I argue that the funds should be collected in proportion to the responsibility for proceeding climate change and redistributed in proportion to the needs for adaption. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.uri en
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title How to Proceed After Copenhagen en
dc.type Article en
eui.subscribe.skip true

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record