Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMAIR, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-15T12:08:59Z
dc.date.available2011-04-15T12:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16354
dc.description.abstractAlthough it is generally seen as desirable that parties in government are both responsive and responsible, these two characteristics are now in increasing tension with one another. Prudence and consistency in government, as well as accountability, requires that governments conform to external constraints and past legacies, and not just answer to public opinion, and while these external constraints and legacies have grown in weight in recent years, public opinion, in its turn, has become harder and harder for governments to read and process. Meanwhile, because of changes in their organizations and in their relationship with civil society, parties in government are no longer in a position to bridge or ‘manage’ this gap, or even to persuade voters to accept it as a necessary element in political life. This problem is illustrated by extensive reference to the current fiscal crisis in Ireland, and is also used to question some of the assumptions that are involved in principal-agent treatments of the parliamentary chain of delegation.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2011/22en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUDO - European Union Democracy Observatoryen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectResponsive governmenten
dc.subjectresponsible governmenten
dc.subjectfiscal austerityen
dc.subjectIrelanden
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.titleBini Smaghi vs. the Parties: Representative government and institutional constraintsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record