Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDE LA PORTE, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorNANZ, Patrizia
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-19T12:47:06Z
dc.date.available2011-04-19T12:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European public policy, 2004, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 267-288
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/16430
dc.description.abstractThe open method of co-ordination's (OMCs) emphasis on transparency, democratic participation and learning has led to a particular interest in this governance mechanism from the perspective of deliberative democracy. This article analyses the 'democratic' dimension of the OMC from a normative and an empirical perspective. We first present relevant theories of deliberative democracy, from which we derive a list of normative criteria, which we then use to explore the democratic quality of the OMC in the areas of employment and pensions. The empirical analysis reveals that there are important differences in the democratic quality of the OMC between these two areas, but that, ultimately, the OMC (as yet) does not live up to its own democratic ambitions.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge : Taylor & Francis
dc.subjectDeliberative democracy
dc.subjectEmployment
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectOpen method of co-ordination (OMC)
dc.subjectParticipation
dc.subjectPensions
dc.subjectPublic debate
dc.subjectTransparency
dc.titleThe OMC : a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? the cases of employment and pensions
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1350176042000194430
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.startpage267
dc.identifier.endpage288
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record