Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMOLLER, Jorgen
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-19T12:48:55Z
dc.date.available2011-04-19T12:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Political Science, 2008, 43, 3, 555-561
dc.identifier.issn1036-1146
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16569
dc.description.abstractAlmost a decade ago, Fareed Zakaria published an article claiming that 'illiberal democracies', i.e., countries combining the presence of free and fair elections with the absence of constitutional liberalism, were on the rise in the present; and were beckoning as a new species of democracy in the future. In this research note, I revisit and reassess Zakaria's claim. On the basis of a simple conceptual critique-that it is logically necessary to treat the two components of liberal democracy as different attributes, conceptually independent of each other-I reach an equally simple empirical conclusion: illiberal democracies were not really on the rise in the 1990s and they have decreased rapidly in the 2000s. The latter finding even comes out using Zakaria's own, arguably flawed, conceptualization.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.titleA Critical Note on 'The Rise of Illiberal Democracy'
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10361140802267316
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.startpage555
dc.identifier.endpage561
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record