Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMUTUSWAMI, Suresh
dc.contributor.authorWINTER, Eyal
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-19T12:48:59Z
dc.date.available2011-04-19T12:48:59Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Public Economics, 2004, 88, 03-abr, 629-644
dc.identifier.issn0047-2727
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/16574
dc.description.abstractWe propose two sequential mechanisms for efficient production of public goods. Our analysis differs from the existing literature in allowing for the presence of multiple public goods and in also being 'simple'. While both mechanisms ensure efficiency, the payoffs in the first mechanism are asymmetric, being sensitive to the order in which agents move. The second mechanism corrects for this through a two-stage game where the order of moves in the second stage is randomly determined. The payoffs from the second mechanism correspond to the Shapley value of a well-defined game which summarizes the production opportunities available to coalitions in the economy. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Sa
dc.subjectpublic goods
dc.subjectmechanism design
dc.subjectShapley value
dc.titleEfficient Mechanisms for Multiple Public Goods
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00218-9
dc.neeo.contributorMUTUSWAMI|Suresh|aut|
dc.neeo.contributorWINTER|Eyal|aut|
dc.identifier.volume88
dc.identifier.startpage629
dc.identifier.endpage644
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue03-abr


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record