Class Inequality and Meritocracy: A Critique of Saunders and An Alternative Analysis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author BREEN, Richard
dc.contributor.author GOLDTHORPE, John H.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-20T14:02:49Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-20T14:02:49Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.citation British Journal of Sociology, 1999, 50, 1, 1-27
dc.identifier.issn 0007-1315
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/16683
dc.description.abstract Saunders' recent work claiming that contemporary British society is to a large extent 'meritocratic' is criticized on conceptual and technical grounds. A reanalysis of the National Child Development Study data-set, used by Saunders, is presented. This reveals that while merit, defined in terms of ability and effort, does play a part in determining individuals' class destinations, the effect of class origins remains strong. Children of less advantaged class origins need to show substantially more merit than children from more advantaged origins in order to gain similar class positions. These differences in findings to some extent arise from the correction of biases introduced by Saunders; but there are also features of his own results, consistent with those reported in the reanalysis, which he appears not to have fully appreciated.
dc.title Class Inequality and Meritocracy: A Critique of Saunders and An Alternative Analysis
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.volume 50
dc.identifier.startpage 1
dc.identifier.endpage 27
eui.subscribe.skip true
dc.identifier.issue 1


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record