Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDENNETT, Daniel C.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-09T10:32:11Z
dc.date.available2011-05-09T10:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1830-7736
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/16895
dc.descriptionThe lecture was delivered on 15 December 2010en
dc.description.abstractSome philosophers and neuroscientists have recently been saying that science shows that we don't have free will, but it turns out that this claim-which would be bad news if true-is due to misrepresentation and misinterpretation. Since free will matters to people, and should matter, these contributions to public misunderstanding are regrettable. When we clarify the issues we see that we will have to make some significant adjustments to our understanding of moral responsibility, allowing for more differences in moral competence than our traditional understanding recognizes.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI MWP LSen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2011/01en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectfree willen
dc.subjectcognitive neuroscienceen
dc.subjectLibeten
dc.subjectdeterminismen
dc.subjectrandomnessen
dc.subjectconsequentialismen
dc.subjectretributivismen
dc.title"My brain made me do it" (when neuroscientists think they can do philosophy)en
dc.typeOtheren
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record