Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBOERI, Tito
dc.contributor.authorBELLMANN, L.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-09T15:11:06Z
dc.date.available2011-05-09T15:11:06Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Labor Economics, 1996, 14, 4, 603-625
dc.identifier.issn0734-306X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16922
dc.description.abstractIn recent years several models have been developed in an attempt to explain countercyclical movements of job turnover, the sum of gross job creation and destruction rates. However, only in the United States is a negative and statistically significant correlation between job turnover and employment growth actually observed. In the other countries studied, job turnover is either acyclical or mildly procyclical. Rather than being associated with the greater flexibility of the United States compared with the Western European labor markets, these asymmetries in the cyclical behavior of gross job flows can be attributed to statistical artifacts, namely, with the fact that U.S. job turnover statistics underrepresent the small business sector and with regression to the mean effects.
dc.titleIs Job Turnover Countercyclical?
dc.typeArticle
dc.neeo.contributorBOERI|Tito|aut|
dc.neeo.contributorBELLMANN|L.|aut|
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.startpage603
dc.identifier.endpage625
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue4


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record