Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHORVATH, Eniko
dc.contributor.authorRUBIO MARIN, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-23T13:39:23Z
dc.date.available2011-05-23T13:39:23Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of constitutional law, 2010, 8, 1, 72-93
dc.identifier.issn1474-2640
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/17327
dc.description.abstractIn this article we explore how constitutionally enshrined and historically conditioned conceptions of membership in Germany have continued to frame citizenship debates over the last two decades. These debates have been revived both by domestic developments, such as mass migration, and by external factors, such as European integration. The larger question examined is the extent to which, at least in the European Union, conceptions of "citizenship" now evolve in reaction to "internal" or "external" factors, and how the balance of such factors shapes the outcome of particular changes in policy. In our inquiry, we look first at the evolution of policy on access to full citizenship in Germany and then at that of its attendant rights and obligations. Finally, we draw certain general conclusions from the German example for European integration and for possible scenarios of coexistence of the national and European citizenship models.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectCitizenship
dc.subjectDomestic affairs
dc.subjectMigration
dc.subjectEuropean integration
dc.subjectConstitutional law
dc.subjectBasic rights
dc.subjectObligation
dc.subjectEuropean Union
dc.subjectGermany
dc.titleAlles oder Nichts'? The outer boundaries of the German citizenship debate
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icon/mop030
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.startpage72
dc.identifier.endpage93
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record