dc.contributor.author | KEATING, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-23T13:41:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-23T13:41:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Regional and federal studies, 2005, 15, 4, 423-435 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1359-7566 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/17492 | |
dc.description.abstract | The twentieth century saw a convergence of the Scottish and English systems of higher education. Since devolution in 1999 there has been divergence. English policy is based on differentiation and competition, while Scotland has favoured integration and more egalitarianism. Scotland has not followed England in introducing up-front tuition fees or top-up fees. These differences are consistent with overall patterns of divergence in public service provision after devolution. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Regional policy | |
dc.subject | Devolution | |
dc.subject | Higher education | |
dc.subject | Social policy | |
dc.subject | Comparative analysis | |
dc.subject | Cross-national analysis | |
dc.subject | Community | |
dc.subject | Regionalism | |
dc.subject | England | |
dc.subject | Scotland | |
dc.subject | United Kingdom | |
dc.title | Higher education in Scotland and England after devolution | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13597560500230524 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 423 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 435 | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |