Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'CONNELL, Rory
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-19T09:29:58Z
dc.date.available2011-07-19T09:29:58Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01
dc.identifier.citationRatio Juris, 1996, 9, 3, 258-282en
dc.identifier.issn1467-9337
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/18199
dc.descriptionExcerpted in Larry MAY, Nancy SNOW and Angela BOLTE (eds), Legal Philosophy: Multiple Perspectives, Indiana, Mayfield, 1999, ISBN: 9780767410090
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the role of moral argument in the Constitutional case law of the Irish courts. It looks at the debate on the constitutional morality of sexuality in four major cases: a 1973 case protecting the right to use contraceptives; a 1984 case which upholds discrimination against gay men; a 1987 case limiting access to abortion information; and a 1992 case which finds a limited right to abortion in the Constitution. These cases show the role of the courts in contributing to a debate on political morality, both proposing new visions of political morality, and elaborating on the requirements of the current one.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.uriThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
dc.titleNatural Law: Alive and Kicking? A Look at the Constitutional Morality of Sexual Privacy in Irelanden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9337.1996.tb00244.x
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record