| Issue Date | View | Title | Author(s) | Type of Publication | Series/Report no. | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Article
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Article
|
-
|
View Abstract
The issue of further harmonisation of copyright at the EU level is currently at the centre of heated debates concerning its desirability and feasibility as such. In the course of 2010 alone, the Wittem Group published its European Copyright Code and the Monti Report addressed the role of copyright in the light of proposing a new strategy for the internal market. However, so far, no decisive legislative actions have been taken at the EU level to address the future of copyright. Despite this impasse, the Court of Justice has acted in a proactive way towards the actual harmonisation of copyright. The decision in Infopaq, as later followed in Bezpe%24cnostní softwarová asociace, has provided the harmonisation of a fundamental principle of copyright, i.e., the originality requirement. The impact of these judgments on the copyright laws of the Member States is likely to be relevant, as made clear (even if just in part) by the ruling of the High Court (England and Wales) in Meltwater, recently upheld by the Court of Appeal for England and Wales. However, the actual implications of CJEU's decisions have yet to be fully worked out: the Football Dataco reference stands as a demonstration of the doubts and ambiguities that Infopaq has cast on the overall architecture of EU copyright.
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Article
|
-
|
View Abstract
In May 2011 Prof. Hargreaves published his review of intellectual property and growth entitled Digital Opportunity, which had been commissioned by the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron. The Hargreaves Report is focused primarily on copyright, which is deemed to have fallen apart from what is needed to promote innovation and competitiveness.1 The Report therefore contains a series of recommendations to improve the quality of UK copyright law and make it fit for the digital age. It advises the UK Government to consider reforming--inter alia--copyright licensing and introducing a digital copyright exchange and extended collecting licensing for orphan works, as well as promoting a single EU market for content licensing. The objectives relating to the reform of copyright licensing are ambitious, in that the relevant recommendations are thought to enormously favour UK competitiveness, if implemented. The present contribution questions whether this can actually be the case in the absence of a stable EU framework for licensing.
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Article
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Article
|
-
|
View Abstract
Comment to CJEU, Case 168/09 Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA, 27 January 2011.
|