Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBAUBÖCK, Rainer
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-25T09:55:59Z
dc.date.available2011-11-25T09:55:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2011, 14, 5, 665–693en
dc.identifier.issn1369-8230
dc.identifier.issn1743-8772
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/19315
dc.descriptionThe fulltext available is a preprint version of an article submitted for consideration in the CRISPP, 2011en
dc.descriptionFirst published online : December 2012
dc.description.abstractTemporary migration raises two different challenges. The first is whether territorial democracies can integrate temporary migrants as equal citizens; the second is whether transnationally mobile societies can be organized democratically as communities of equal citizens. Considering both questions within a single analytical framework will reveal a dilemma: on the one hand, liberals have good reasons to promote the expansion of categories of free-moving citizens as the most effective and normatively attractive response to the problem of partial citizenship for temporary migrants; yet, on the other hand, if free movement rights were actually used by too many, this might fatally undermine the sustainability of intergenerational and territorial democratic polities.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.tandfonline.comen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecttemporary migrationen
dc.subjectpartial citizenshipen
dc.subjectfree movementen
dc.subjecthypermigrationen
dc.subjectlife-course perspectiveen
dc.titleTemporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigrationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13698230.2011.617127
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record