Restricted Access
Government, opposition and the strategies of adaptation of national parties to European integration : a comparative study
Loading...
Files
PDF in Restricted Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, 2011
EUI; SPS; PhD Thesis
Cite
PETITHOMME, Mathieu, Government, opposition and the strategies of adaptation of national parties to European integration : a comparative study, Florence : European University Institute, 2011, EUI, SPS, PhD Thesis - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/19439
Abstract
This thesis deals with the ways distinct types of parties in government or in opposition have adapted their strategies of competition to handle EU integration. The thesis draws on data from four countries – Britain, France, Ireland and Spain – over the past 15 years of electoral politics. The thesis provides a comparative and longitudinal analysis of their strategies of politicisation and of depoliticisation in relation with the parties? different statuses within their party systems (incumbent, mainstream opposition and peripheral opposition) and in three distinct arenas (national elections, European elections and EU referendums). It investigates how these parties have handled EU issues in three complementary dimensions of their activities: in their strategies of political communication, in intra-party debates over the EU and in their responses to the consolidation of the European electoral arena. The thesis uses a mix-method approach based on claims-making analysis, thick qualitative comparisons and descriptive statistics. Contradicting the idea of a gradual europeanisation, it first provides evidence for the stable marginalisation and nationalisation of EU affairs. Second, while the rise of euroscepticism is often discussed, the thesis demonstrates that conflicts over EU matters are rarely prominent in practice, and that they remain sporadic and confined to certain electoral channels, with mainstream parties actively compartmentalising the potential divisive effects of EU issues within their organisations. Third, it points to the centrality of the twofold behaviour of opposition parties, explaining why the politicisation of EU matters has remained contextual and less linked to the role of radical parties than is usually recognised. It finally delineates a process of increasing seclusion between the national and European political arenas that can be observed through the trajectories of MEPs careers in relation to their domestic political spaces or through the disengagement of national parties from campaigning in EU elections.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Defence date: 18 October 2011
Examining Board: Prof. Alexander Trechsel, European University Institute; Prof. Peter Mair (†), European University Institute (Supervisor); Prof. Stefano Bartolini, European University Institute; Prof. Florence Haegel, Sciences-Po Paris; Prof. Robert Ladrech, Keele University
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
Examining Board: Prof. Alexander Trechsel, European University Institute; Prof. Peter Mair (†), European University Institute (Supervisor); Prof. Stefano Bartolini, European University Institute; Prof. Florence Haegel, Sciences-Po Paris; Prof. Robert Ladrech, Keele University
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses