Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAMAYA-CASTRO, Juan M.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31T14:09:44Z
dc.date.available2012-01-31T14:09:44Z
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2011, 4, 2, 137-161en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/20181
dc.description.abstractThis article introduces the notion of ‘illegality regimes’ and argues that the creation, enhancement, and strengthening of these regimes has a transformative, and perhaps even corrosive effect on the meaning and value of citizenship itself. The notion of illegality regimes refers to the complex normative and policy framework that is either intended to, or otherwise has the effect of marginalizing or otherwise excluding irregular migrants, and to assist the authorities in the process of localizing and deporting them. Much of the political and scholarly attention in the context of illegality is focused on how illegality regimes affect migrants and refugees, how these regimes weaken their human rights, and generally run contrary to liberal principles such as equality before the law and non-discrimination. However, the objective here is to explore how it is not just the undocumented migrant that is directly or indirectly affected by the illegality regimes, but also regular migrants, asylum seekers, and finally full citizens themselves. The ways in which this happens is by a progressive transformation of what it means to be a citizen, and by means of a re-accommodation of the relation between the citizen and the state. As globalization unleashes migratory processes, the state adapts. Citizenship adapts along.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleIllegality Regimes and the Ongoing Transformation of Contemporary Citizenshipen
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record