Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCARO DE SOUSA, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31T14:12:27Z
dc.date.available2012-01-31T14:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2011, 4, 2, 162-191en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/20182
dc.description.abstractThis Article submits that questions of institutional ability and legitimacy should play a more important role in the Court of Justice’s decision-making process. In effect, both the legal literature and the Court’s reasoning process tend to disregard such questions, thereby ignoring relevant comparative institutional choices which take place whether they are acknowledged or not. The deficiencies arising from the current approach will be exemplified by an analysis of developments in EU‘s free movement law on the requirements of cross-border elements, economic aim of free movement, and on the complementarity of these two requirements. In particular, it will be argued that the absence of properly reasoned institutional comparative analysis, when coupled with under-theorised normative foundations and the introduction of European Citizenship, has potentially explosive consequences for the scope of the EU’s market freedoms.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleCatch Me If You Can? The market freedoms’ ever-expanding outer limitsen
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record