Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROMERO, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T11:29:08Z
dc.date.available2012-02-16T11:29:08Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationQuaderni del dipartimento di Scienze Politiche Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2011, 1, 1, 139-150en
dc.identifier.isbn978-88-8311-852-4
dc.identifier.issn2239-7302
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/20436
dc.description.abstractThe image of a harmonious Atlantic alliance occasionally riven by acute crises was the actors’ own perception, and recurring fear, throughout its Cold War history. A long-term historical assessment, however, emphasizes a continuum of carefully managed frictions and disagreements. Differences were the norm, not the exception. More importantly, they were an asset rather than a burden. The negotiated, flexible accommodation of diversity expanded the range of Alliance policies, multiplied its diplomatic resources, and projected a more inclusive, attractive image. In the aftermath of détente, in particular, trans-Atlantic differences on East-West relations multiplied the comparative advantage of the West and played a key role in the peaceful demise of the Soviet empire.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.educatt.it/libri/ebooks/D-00000179%20QDSP01_2011.pdfen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleNATO: The management of diversityen
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record