On Methods Used to Check Compensation for Additional Costs Generated by a Policy of Selling Below Cost in the Door-To-Door Parcel Delivery Sector

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author GEBSKI, Szymon
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-05T09:23:22Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-05T09:23:22Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2011, 2, 4, 616-620 en
dc.identifier.issn 1867-299X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/20855
dc.description.abstract Case C-399/08 P European Commission v. Deutsche Post AG [2010], not yet published. -- 1. The Commission is not entitled to assume that State resources constitute an advantage when it fails to examine whether: (i) the total amount of those resources exceeds the total amount of the net additional costs incurred by an undertaking providing an SGEI; (ii) that undertaking has other net additional costs associated with the provision of an SGEI for which it has the right to claim compensation. -- 2. The use of a method different from that arising from Altmark Trans is justified only when the Commission is prevented, for objective reasons, from undertaking an examination of the information provided by a Member State. -- 3. Even if the General Court is wrong in law when it examines information that was not subject to any analysis in the Commission’s decision, this did not affect the validity of its foregoing finding on the illegality of the contested decision (author’s headnotes). en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title On Methods Used to Check Compensation for Additional Costs Generated by a Policy of Selling Below Cost in the Door-To-Door Parcel Delivery Sector en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record