National Parties and Group Membership in the European Parliament: Ideology or pragmatism?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author BRESSANELLI, Edoardo
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-14T16:09:43Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-14T16:09:43Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Journal of European Public Policy, 2012, 19, 5, 737-754 en
dc.identifier.issn 1350-1763
dc.identifier.issn 1466-4429
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/21194
dc.description Available online: 01 Mar 2012 en
dc.description.abstract This contribution investigates the factors behind political group membership in the European Parliament. In June 2009, more than 150 national parties, from the 27 member countries, joined one of the seven transnational groupings. Two main explanations for group membership are advanced. A first, traditional argument is based on the ideological or policy compatibility of the member parties. National parties will join the political group that best matches their programmatic position. A second argument focuses, instead, on the structure of incentives in the Parliament, positing that the pragmatic goals of national parties are better advanced by joining the largest and most influential groups. These arguments are tested by fitting a multinomial logit model for political group ‘choice’ based on the 2009 Euromanifestos data. The findings suggest that ideological compatibility is the most important factor behind transnational affiliation, even if some caution is needed for the ‘new’, post-communist members. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Routledge en
dc.title National Parties and Group Membership in the European Parliament: Ideology or pragmatism? en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/13501763.2011.646790


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record