Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROSATI, Eleonora
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-18T07:53:35Z
dc.date.available2012-04-18T07:53:35Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2012, 7, 4, 238-239en
dc.identifier.issn1747-1540
dc.identifier.issn1747-1532
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/21634
dc.descriptionThe present note is based upon an earlier blog post prepared for the 1709 Blog http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/. Advance Access Publication 22 February 2012en
dc.description.abstractGolan et al. v Holder, Attorney General, et al., US Supreme Court, 565 US (2012), 18 January 2012. In a 6-2 ruling, the US Supreme Court held that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) of 1994, which President Clinton had signed into law in order to restore copyright protection in foreign works which had fallen into the public domain, did not exceed Congress's authority under the Copyright Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleUS Supreme Court Says Public Domain Works May Return to Copyrighten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jiplp/jps017


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record