| dc.contributor.author | ROSATI, Eleonora | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-18T07:53:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-04-18T07:53:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2012, 7, 4, 238-239 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1747-1540 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1747-1532 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/21634 | |
| dc.description | The present note is based upon an earlier blog post prepared for the 1709 Blog http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/. Advance Access Publication 22 February 2012 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Golan et al. v Holder, Attorney General, et al., US Supreme Court, 565 US (2012), 18 January 2012. In a 6-2 ruling, the US Supreme Court held that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) of 1994, which President Clinton had signed into law in order to restore copyright protection in foreign works which had fallen into the public domain, did not exceed Congress's authority under the Copyright Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution). | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.title | US Supreme Court Says Public Domain Works May Return to Copyright | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jiplp/jps017 | |