Limes. Il confine nell’era postglobale

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author FERRARA, Pasquale
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-19T11:27:14Z
dc.date.available 2012-04-19T11:27:14Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Sophia, 2011, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 183-194 en
dc.identifier.issn 2036-5047
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/21661
dc.description.abstract It can be equally affirmed that a boundary is not only division but at the same time also relation. Borders mark a limit, but also the desire of surpassing it. The “classical” boundary is a point of disjunction, and it is of a nature that is sacred as well as functional; it is difficult to conceive it as definitive and unchangeable. At the dawn of the modern world, however, a “new” idea of boundary appears, which is no longer understood in terms of the ancient empire tradition as “defense” or delimitation of a conquered space, but as a structural element of division. This kind of border (spatial, mental, cultural, ideological) is what makes someone a foreigner. Nonetheless, a noncritical perspective of overriding borders could be just as insidious; for example, a hypothetical world State would risk presenting itself as Cosmopolis, as a totalizing maxima civitas. Today, the possibility of a political theory without spatial fractures is being explored. But what condition makes such a connection possible? A solution can be perceived on the level of a “symbolic” reconceptualization of boundaries. The subdivision of the world makes sense only if it is understood as the pre-condition for its being shared. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso it en
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title Limes. Il confine nell’era postglobale en
dc.type Article en
eui.subscribe.skip true


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record