Limes. Il confine nell’era postglobale

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author FERRARA, Pasquale
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-19T11:27:14Z
dc.date.available 2012-04-19T11:27:14Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Sophia III, 2011, 15, 2, 183-194 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/21661
dc.description.abstract It can be equally affirmed that a boundary is not only division but at the same time also relation. Borders mark a limit, but also the desire of surpassing it. The “classical” boundary is a point of disjunction, and it is of a nature that is sacred as well as functional; it is difficult to conceive it as definitive and unchangeable. At the dawn of the modern world, however, a “new” idea of boundary appears, which is no longer understood in terms of the ancient empire tradition as “defense” or delimitation of a conquered space, but as a structural element of division. This kind of border (spatial, mental, cultural, ideological) is what makes someone a foreigner. Nonetheless, a noncritical perspective of overriding borders could be just as insidious; for example, a hypothetical world State would risk presenting itself as Cosmopolis, as a totalizing maxima civitas. Today, the possibility of a political theory without spatial fractures is being explored. But what condition makes such a connection possible? A solution can be perceived on the level of a “symbolic” reconceptualization of boundaries. The subdivision of the world makes sense only if it is understood as the pre-condition for its being shared. en
dc.language.iso it en
dc.title Limes. Il confine nell’era postglobale en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record