Politics after Indignation. Possibilities and limits of direct democracy

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author INNERARITY, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-30T14:22:51Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-30T14:22:51Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 1028-3625
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/23358
dc.description.abstract The year 2011 may go down in history as the year of the indignation; this word sums up a movement that has become a widespread disaffection with politics in a new kind of protest. Is this a new version of the popular revolutionary practice? How is the relationship between the institutions and the street in a disintermediated world? Is the political mistrust an advertisement of the next crisis of democracy or another stage of their settlement? In any case, the very idea of representation is challenged from a claim that can lead to populism in so far as it does not seem to understand the limitations of democratic self-determination and the nature of our political condition. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartofseries EUI RSCAS en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2012/42 en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global Governance Programme-25 en
dc.subject indignation en
dc.subject representation en
dc.subject direct democracy en
dc.subject disintermediation en
dc.title Politics after Indignation. Possibilities and limits of direct democracy en
dc.type Working Paper en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record