Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARZIA, Diego
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-19T08:16:52Z
dc.date.available2012-09-19T08:16:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationPolitics, 2012, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 175–185en
dc.identifier.issn0263-3957
dc.identifier.issn1467-9256
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/23834
dc.descriptionFirst published online: October 2012
dc.description.abstractSocial-psychological models of voting behaviour systematically downsize the relevance of party leader evaluations by conceiving them as mere consequences of causally prior partisan attachments. However, the validity of this interpretation depends heavily on the effectively exogenous status of party identification. Empirical research shows that the assumed exogeneity of partisanship is, at best, doubtful. In such a context, single-equation models of voting are likely to provide seriously biased estimates. By employing the proper econometric procedures (instrumental variable estimation) and the most appropriate data sources to address causality issues (panel data) this study provides strong support in favour of the personalisation hypothesis.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleParty and Leader Effects in Parliamentary Elections: Towards a reassessmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01443.x
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record