Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGLENCROSS, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-24T14:03:43Z
dc.date.available2012-09-24T14:03:43Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationBasingstoke/New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009en
dc.identifier.isbn9780230224506
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/23918
dc.description(Published version of EUI PhD thesis, 2007.)en
dc.description.abstractDrawing on international relations theory, law and historical analysis, this book compares European integration with the antebellum USA to assess what makes the EU viable despite contestation over the rules of the game of integration. It reveals that changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.en
dc.description.tableofcontents--List of Tables --Acknowledgements xi --Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable 1 (6) --The Problem of Viability in a Compound Polity --Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic --Comparing How the Rules of the Game are Contested --The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration --Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems --The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization --Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration 182 (2) --Applying the insights of this study 184 (5) --Notes 189 (17) --Bibliography 206 (18) --Index
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen
dc.titleWhat Makes the EU Viable? European integration in the light of the antebellum US experienceen
dc.typeBooken


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record