Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROSE, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMISHLER, William
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-02T10:44:21Z
dc.date.available2012-10-02T10:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Crime, 2010, 11, 2, 145-163en
dc.identifier.issn1744-0572
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/24015
dc.description.abstractCorruption is important because it undermines bureaucratic predictability and is a potential threat to support for a political regime. The perception of corruption is the most commonly used measure of the actual incidence of corruption. This paper marshals survey data from the New Russia Barometer to challenge this assumption. It finds that even though most Russians perceive a variety of everyday public services as corrupt, this assessment is not based on firsthand experience. Only a minority pays bribes. It tests four hypotheses about differences in individual perception and experience of paying bribes: the ability to pay, contact with public services, normative acceptability, and political awareness. It finds that contact is most important for paying bribes while political awareness is most important for the perception of corruption. It also tests how much the perception and experience of corruption, as against other forms of political and economic performance, affect support for the regime. It finds that support is driven by the substantive performance of government, and above all management of the economy, rather than by indicators of corruption.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleExperience versus Perception of Corruption: Russia as a test caseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17440571003669175
dc.identifier.doi1744-0580


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record