The Fabric of International Jurisprudence: An interdisciplinary encounter

Cadmus Home
>
Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS)
>
RSCAS Working Papers
>
View Item

dc.contributor.editor	VAUCHEZ, Antoine
dc.contributor.other	VAUCHEZ, Antoine
dc.contributor.other	SOLANKE, Iyiola
dc.contributor.other	DALLARA, Cristina
dc.contributor.other	PETKOVA, Bilyana
dc.contributor.other	PORTA, Jérome
dc.contributor.other	VAN BOCKEL, Bas
dc.date.accessioned	2012-10-05T13:22:57Z
dc.date.available	2012-10-05T13:22:57Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.issn	1028-3625
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1814/24095
dc.description.abstract	Bringing together a variety of outlooks from comparative law, legal theory, organizational sociology, socio-legal studies or political science, this Joint Working Papers explores the cognitive equipment through which international judges perform their role. The notion of 'fabric', borrowed from the Science and technology studies, and Bruno Latour in particular, is used here as a common entrypoint enabling to consider altogether the (legal and non-legal, formal and unformal) tools and templates that contribute to shape international judicial decision-making: 'best practices', judicial compendia, routinized legal repertoires, legal methodologies, standard operational modes, etc…	en
dc.description.tableofcontents	-- Antoine Vauchez, Introduction 1 -- Part 1. Actors and Know-How 3 -- Antoine Vauchez, The European Themis and its Social Fabric. Review, Reflections and New Directions for Studies of the European Court of Justice 5 -- Iyiola Solanké, The Advocate General and the Practices of International Jurisprudence 15 -- Cristina Dallara, The Definition of ‘Best Judicial Practices’ by Judicial and Legal Expert Networks and Commissions 21 -- Part 2. Methods and Tools 33 -- Bilyana Petkova, The Role of Majoritarian Activism in Precedent Formation at the European Court of Human Rights 35 -- Jérome Porta, La formulation des interprétations par la Cour de Justice de l'Union européenne 45 -- Bas van Bockel, The Realisation of the ne bis in idem Principle in the European Union 53	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	EUI RSCAS	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	2012/51	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Global Governance Programme-27	en
dc.subject	European Law	en
dc.subject	International courts	en
dc.subject	Court of Justice of the European Union	en
dc.subject	European Court of Human Rights	en
dc.subject	Judicial Decision-Making	en
dc.subject	Sociology of Law	en
dc.title	The Fabric of International Jurisprudence: An interdisciplinary encounter	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en