Preaching to the choir or converting the uninitiated? : The integrative potential of ingroup deliberations

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author VASILEV, George
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-08T14:50:46Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-08T14:50:46Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2013, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 109-129 en
dc.identifier.issn 1369-8230
dc.identifier.issn 1743-8772
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/24122
dc.description Version of record first published: 13 Mar 2012 en
dc.description.abstract Deliberative democrats responding to the challenge of fostering reciprocity and civic friendship discourage in-group deliberations, taking them to stoke hostilities and preclude the possibility of sociability between groups. In opposition to these views, I argue that in-group deliberation presents itself as a promising, yet underappreciated, normative category for conflict transformation. I support this claim with reference to the observation that deliberative exchanges among like members are just as, if not more, consequential in the facilitation of positive actor transformations than deliberations among unlike members, especially when antipathy defines group relations. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Preaching to the choir or converting the uninitiated? : The integrative potential of ingroup deliberations en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/13698230.2012.664373


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record