Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVASILEV, George
dc.identifier.citationCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2013, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 109-129en
dc.descriptionVersion of record first published: 13 Mar 2012en
dc.description.abstractDeliberative democrats responding to the challenge of fostering reciprocity and civic friendship discourage in-group deliberations, taking them to stoke hostilities and preclude the possibility of sociability between groups. In opposition to these views, I argue that in-group deliberation presents itself as a promising, yet underappreciated, normative category for conflict transformation. I support this claim with reference to the observation that deliberative exchanges among like members are just as, if not more, consequential in the facilitation of positive actor transformations than deliberations among unlike members, especially when antipathy defines group relations.en
dc.titlePreaching to the choir or converting the uninitiated? : The integrative potential of ingroup deliberationsen

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record