Hell Freezes Over: A climate change for assessing exclusionary conduct under article 102 TFEU

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author ROUSSEVA, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.author MARQUIS, Mel
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-08T16:42:45Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-08T16:42:45Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, 2012, First published online: October 25, 2012 en
dc.identifier.issn 2041-7764
dc.identifier.issn 2041-7772
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/24339
dc.description.abstract The ECJ's judgment in Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet seems to herald new rigour in the application of Article 102 TFEU to exclusionary pricing practices by dominant firms. The judgment clarifies that the core criterion by which to judge exclusionary conduct under Article 102 is its actual or likely effect on competition, and thereby on consumers. The judgment also signals a decision on the part of the ECJ to embrace fundamental concepts advocated in the Commission's Guidance Paper on exclusionary conduct under Article 102, and in doing so contributes to enhanced legal certainty. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher OUP en
dc.title Hell Freezes Over: A climate change for assessing exclusionary conduct under article 102 TFEU en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/jeclap/lps059


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record