Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBRESSANELLI, Edoardo
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-13T13:11:10Z
dc.date.available2012-11-13T13:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European integration, 2013, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 653-668en
dc.identifier.issn0703-6337
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/24416
dc.descriptionVersion of record first published: 17 Aug 2012en
dc.description.abstractOn the bases of the new EU Profiler data for the 2009 European Parliament elections, this work looks at two basic criteria to assess the representative potential of the EU party system: its competitiveness and the policy coherence of its parties. It is here argued that, if the national parties are successfully able to aggregate their programmes and agendas at the EU level, proposing different options to the European voters, the EU ‘democratic deficit’ might not be as severe as it is often lamented. It is found that the Europarties, despite the enlargements towards Central and Eastern Europe, are sufficiently coherent and different to seek to fulfil an expressive, or representative, function. By selectively placing its focus on the ‘supply-side’ of politics, this work shows that European voters could indeed make meaningful choices, which the Europarties might turn into concrete policies through their parliamentary activity.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European integration
dc.titleCompetitive and coherent? : profiling the Europarties in the 2009 European Parliament electionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07036337.2012.711824
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.startpage653
dc.identifier.endpage668
dc.identifier.issue6


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record