Open Access
Economic disadvantage in Central and Eastern Europe : what difference does social assistance make?
Loading...
Files
Avram_2013_SPS.pdf (2.78 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, 2013
EUI; SPS; PhD Thesis
Cite
AVRAM, Silvia, Economic disadvantage in Central and Eastern Europe : what difference does social assistance make?, Florence : European University Institute, 2013, EUI, SPS, PhD Thesis - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/24615
Abstract
The present study analyses the impact of social assistance programs on poverty, broadly construed as economic disadvantage, in eight Central and East European countries during the mid-2000s. It does that by examining cross-national & cross-temporal variation program features and specificities to identify patterns of association with outcomes of interest such as poverty levels, individual long-term income, earnings and assets. The main data source used throughout the study is the 2007 longitudinal component of the European Union-Survey of Income and Living Condition (EU-SILC). Social assistance programs in CEE are a marginal component of the social protection system in all eight countries. They serve small populations, spend relatively little compared to needs and the benefits they award are largely a top-up for their clients. Both the ability of the programs to reach the poor and, the ability to provide them with sufficient resources to bring them above the relative poverty threshold are found lacking. However, the more extensive and liberal programs achieved higher effectiveness in reducing poverty, and directed a greater share of their resources to the very poor. Contrary to theoretical expectations, no link was found between generosity and efficiency. Discretion has been linked to very poor targeting performance, suggesting arbitrariness in entitlement and spending decisions. No conclusive evidence of a work disincentive effect of social assistance programs could be discerned. Most importantly, any work disincentives that the programs might create could not be linked to the benefits they provide. Instead, lower future incomes appear to be related to program participation as such rather than disbursed benefits. Finally, social assistance programs could not be shown to impede asset accumulation among low-income households. With the exception of debt management, there are no indications that the income floor implicit in the programs represents a disincentive to saving.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Defence date: 17 January 2013
Examining Board: Professor Martin Kohli, European University Institute (Supervisor) Professor Chris de Neubourg, UNICEF-IRC (External Co-supervisor) Professor Fabrizio Bernardi, European University Institute Professor Jonathan Bradshaw, University of York.
Examining Board: Professor Martin Kohli, European University Institute (Supervisor) Professor Chris de Neubourg, UNICEF-IRC (External Co-supervisor) Professor Fabrizio Bernardi, European University Institute Professor Jonathan Bradshaw, University of York.