Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCHRISTENSEN, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-17T14:24:42Z
dc.date.available2012-12-17T14:24:42Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationGovernance, 2012, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 563-584en
dc.identifier.issn0952-1895
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/24936
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 21 November 2012en
dc.description.abstractWhy did New Zealand adopt one of the most neoliberal tax systems in the world, whereas Ireland pursued a heterodox tax policy of low rates, deep deductions, and distortionary tax incentives? The diverging tax policy trajectories of these two small liberal market economies since 1980 are not well accounted for by conventional ideational, partisan, or political-institutional explanations. The article argues that the varying degree of neoliberal reform is better understood as the result of differences in the institutionalization of economic knowledge within the state. Distinct administrative institutions in New Zealand and Ireland gave rise to profound differences in the identities, expertise, economic ideas, and policy advice approach of tax policy bureaucrats, which had a major impact on tax policymaking in the two countries.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleBureaucracies, neoliberal ideas, and tax reform in New Zealand and Irelanden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gove.12009
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record