Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCROSS, James P.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-08T08:47:18Z
dc.date.available2013-02-08T08:47:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2013, Vol. 52, No 3, pp. 291-315en
dc.identifier.issn2047-8844
dc.identifier.issn0304-4130
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/25794
dc.descriptionArticle first published online: 19 Nov 2012
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, transparency (or the lack thereof) has become a central concern of the European Union and its attempts to increase the democratic legitimacy of the legislative decision-making process. The claim regularly made is that increasing transparency increases the potential for holding decision makers to account. This study investigates the manner in which transparency in the decision-making process affects the policy positions taken by negotiators at the outset of negotiations. The findings presented suggest that increasing transparency tends to lead to polarisation of negotiations, with negotiators taking more extreme positions when they know that their positions can be observed by outside parties. The implication of this result is that advocates of transparency should be aware that there is an inherent trade-off between increasing transparency, on the one hand, and increasing the incentives to grandstand during negotiations, on the other.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleStriking a pose : transparency and position taking in the Council of the European Unionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-6765.12000


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record