Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRUESTER, Sophia
dc.contributor.authorSCHWENEN, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorLASSOURCE, Adeline
dc.contributor.authorFINGER, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorGLACHANT, Jean-Michel
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-28T12:50:59Z
dc.date.available2013-02-28T12:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1977-3900
dc.identifier.issn1977-3919
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26145
dc.descriptionQM-AI-13-101-EN-Cen
dc.descriptionQM-AI-13-101-EN-Nen
dc.description.abstract–– Market actors are calling for a post-2020 energy technology policy framework now. As a result, the policy is likely to be negotiated in a time of fierce global competition in clean-tech markets, financial crisis and institutional frictions in the EU. To contribute to the debate and to assist DG ENER to prepare a new Communication on ‘Energy Technologies in a future European Energy Policy’, our THINK report discusses a renewed EU energy technology policy towards 2050. –– A first possible policy path would be to extend the 2020 policies to 2030 and 2050. From this reference case, departures in two major ways are possible. Policy path 2 would rely on a strong carbon price signal and technology-neutral support to innovation. In contrast, an alternative policy path 3 would depart from a weak carbon price signal and technology targets. –– A multi-criteria evaluation shows that no single policy path is clearly superior to another. Therefore, a renewed SET Plan should allow for all possible future policy paths. Priority technologies that are key to achieve 2050 objectives and/or can help to support green growth within the EU should be identified based on a comprehensive approach across sectors. –– But not only the policy context is uncertain. There are also other possible futures not yet recognized in the EU Energy Roadmap 2050. First, shifts in paradigm of EU energy policy away from decarbonization and in favor of competitiveness or supply security might call for strong technology support. Second, technological revolutions, such as a global shale gas revolution, could result in the “rational” price of carbon falling extremely low. –– There are several reasons that justify some directed technology push, instead of building fully on technology-neutral support to innovation. Pushing energy efficiency enhancing and enabling technologies thereby offers a no-regret strategy in any future setting and dominates other push strategies in terms of implementability and robustness. Creating options for technology breakthroughs has to be a main pillar in any future SET-Plan.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFlorence School of Regulationen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013/01en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolicy Briefsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergyen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.florence-school.eu
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleA new EU energy technology policy towards 2050 : which way to go?
dc.typeOtheren
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record