| dc.contributor.author | PRAKKEN, Henry | |
| dc.contributor.author | SARTOR, Giovanni | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-14T11:36:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-03-14T11:36:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Katie M. ATKINSON (ed.), Proceedings of JURIX 2011: The twenty-fourth annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems, Amsterdam, IOS, 2011, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Volume 235: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 83-92 | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781607509806 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781607509813 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/26283 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A formal model is proposed of argumentation with burdens and standards of proof, overcoming shortcomings of earlier work. The model is based on a distinction between default and inverted burdens of proof. This distinction is formalised by adapting the definition of defeat of the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. Since ASPIC+ generates abstract argumentation frameworks, the model is thus given a Dungean semantics. It is shown to adequately capture shifting proof burdens as well as Carneades' definitions of proof standards. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.relation.uri | http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/legal-knowledge-and-information-systems-7 | en |
| dc.title | On Modelling Burdens and Standards of Proof in Structured Argumentation | en |
| dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-83 | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |