Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHEIMBACH-STEINS, Marianne
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-18T14:53:18Z
dc.date.available2013-03-18T14:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26335
dc.description.abstractIn May 2012, a German court in Cologne ruled that circumcising young boys represents grievous bodily harm. This decision, which touched upon the questions of freedom of religious practice, identity and children’s rights, was condemned by Jewish and Muslim representatives in Germany, but it was also widely and controversially debated by civil society and politicians. The German Parliament recently passed legislation protecting circumcision as a religious practice, but the debate is likely to continue. In this paper, Marianne Heimbach-Steins, director of the department of Christian Social Ethics at the University of Münster (Germany), discuss this case and its implications for the definition of religious freedom.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/269860
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013/18en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRELIGIOWESTen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCircumcisionen
dc.subjectGermanyen
dc.subjectIslamen
dc.subjectJudaismen
dc.subjectHuman rightsen
dc.subjectReligious freedomen
dc.titleReligious freedom and the German circumcision debateen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record