Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRUTA, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-04T15:34:37Z
dc.date.available2013-04-04T15:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1830-1541
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26495
dc.description.abstractHow can economic theory be useful in WTO arbitrations? Motivated by this question, this paper reviews the approach that is often used to determine the level of permissible retaliation in international trade disputes (the, so called, "trade effect" approach), and its implementation under specific policy scenarios (tariffs, quotas, subsidies). Through these examples, the paper argues that economic theory, in addition to quantitative economics, can play a useful role in assisting WTO arbitrators in understanding the pros and cons of the trade effect approach and in implementing this approach under different policy scenarios.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCAS PPen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013/02en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programmeen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Economicsen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectWTO arbitrationsen
dc.subjectEconomic theoryen
dc.subjectPermissible retaliationen
dc.subject.otherTrade, investment and international cooperation
dc.titleThe role of economic theory in WTO arbitrationsen
dc.typeOtheren
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record