Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNETŠUNAJEV, Aleksei
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-29T08:14:02Z
dc.date.available2013-04-29T08:14:02Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2013en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26775
dc.descriptionDefence date: 27 March 2013en
dc.descriptionExamining Board: Professor Helmut Lütkepohl, DIW Berlin and Freie Universität (External Supervisor); Professor Fabio Canova, European University Institute; Professor Helmut Herwartz, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; Professor Markku Lanne, University of Helsinki
dc.description.abstractStructural vector autoregressions are of great importance in applied macroeconometric work. The main di culty associated with structural analysis is to identify unique shocks of interest. In a conventional approach this is done via zero or sign restrictions. Heteroskedasticity is proposed for use in identi cation. Under certain assumptions when volatility of shocks changes over time, unique shocks can be obtained. Then formal testing of the restrictions and impulse response analysis can be performed. In this thesis I show how identi cation via heteroskedasticity can be used in di erent contexts. In the rst chapter I analyze the dynamics of trade balances in response to macroeconomic shocks. I show that identifying restrictions, which are known in the literature, are rejected for two out of seven countries. Partially identi ed models fail to provide enough information to fully identify shocks. The second chapter, coauthored with my supervisor, demonstrates how one can bene t from identi cation via heteroskedasticity when sign restrictions are used. The approach is illustrated with a model of the crude oil market. It is shown that shocks identi ed via previously known sign restrictions are in line with the properties of the data. Use of tighter restrictions uncovers that the approach can be discriminative. The third chapter reconsiders the con icting results in the debate on the e ects of technology shocks on hours worked. Using six ways of identifying technology shocks, I nd that not all of them are supported by the data. There is no clear-cut evidence in favor of positive reaction of hours to technology shocks. However, it is plausible for real wage and disentangled investment-speci c and neutral technology shocks, even though conventional identi cation of the latter shocks is rejected.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesECOen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectEconometricsen
dc.subjectMarkov processesen
dc.titleStructural vector autoregressions with Markov switching : identification via heteroskedasticityen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/73498
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record