Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHEFEKER, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorTORRES, Francisco S.
dc.contributor.authorBONGARDT, Annette
dc.contributor.authorWUNSCH, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorHERMANN, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-03T13:55:42Z
dc.date.available2013-05-03T13:55:42Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationIntereconomics : Review of European Economic Policy, 2013, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 72-92en
dc.identifier.issn1613-964X
dc.identifier.issn0020-5346
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26854
dc.description.abstractThe EU has long viewed economic and institutional convergence as important goals, but the results thus far have been decidedly mixed, and there remain several open questions: How exactly should convergence be defined? How much convergence is necessary? What steps can be taken to improve convergence in the EU, and how can success be defined? Finally, how much convergence can be achieved by improving the economic performance in underperforming regions, and how can convergence in the form of harmonisation towards lower welfare levels be avoided?en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.intereconomics.eu/archive/jahr/2013/2/en
dc.relation.urihttp://www.intereconomics.eu/archive/jahr/2013/2/849/hu/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleForum "Convergence in the EU"en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10272-013-0448-9


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record